<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Consulting Washington DC &#187; Wall of Shame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webconsultingdc.com/category/wall-of-shame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webconsultingdc.com</link>
	<description>It's a dirty job, but somebody's gotta do it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 20:13:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Epsilon data breach (or, why it pays to go with the little guy)</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultingdc.com/2011/epsilon-data-breach-and-why-it-pays-to-go-with-the-little-guy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webconsultingdc.com/2011/epsilon-data-breach-and-why-it-pays-to-go-with-the-little-guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Panayiotakis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[It's Just Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall of Shame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultingdc.com/?p=1427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[File this under &#8220;rants&#8220;.
Big business has a herd mentality.  It seems all the financial institutions I use, and other large non-financial institutions I use, all use Epsilon.  I can&#8217;t see a reason for it except that they&#8217;re all acting like sheep.  Over the past two weeks, I&#8217;ve received three or four emails about Epsilon stealing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>File this under &#8220;<a href="http://www.webconsultingdc.com/category/philosophy/">rants</a>&#8220;.<img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1428" title="iStock_000015498827XSmall" src="http://www.webconsultingdc.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/iStock_000015498827XSmall-300x201.jpg" alt="iStock_000015498827XSmall" width="300" height="201" /></p>
<p>Big business has a herd mentality.  It seems all the financial institutions I use, and other large non-financial institutions I use, all use <a href="http://www.epsilon.com/News%20&amp;%20Events/Press_Releases_2011/Epsilon_Notifies_Clients_of_Unauthorized_Entry_into_Email_System/p1057-l3" target="_blank">Epsilon</a>.  I can&#8217;t see a reason for it except that they&#8217;re all acting like sheep.  Over the past two weeks, I&#8217;ve received three or four emails about <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/04/07/135218057/congress-seeks-more-information-on-epsilon-data-breach" target="_blank">Epsilon stealing my data</a>. And I&#8217;m thinking, why is it that the big companies always screw us over, and then try to hide what&#8217;s been going on?<span id="more-1427"></span></p>
<p>Now, I understand that shit happens.  Data get breached.  Of course, data don&#8217;t breach themselves.  And breach didn&#8217;t just come down about the data like a plague of locusts.  &#8221;Data&#8221; are not &#8220;breached&#8221;.  Systems are.  &#8221;<a class="zem_slink" title="Data breach" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_breach">Data breach</a>&#8221;  is a blameless way of saying your shit got hacked.  This could be because of lax data, systems, and security practices.  Or it could not be.  It seems to me when this happens to big companies, two themes repeat themselves:</p>
<ol>
<li>They try to hide or sugarcoat the problem</li>
<li>They care about the bottom line more than they care about me</li>
<li><a title="Transocean awards safety bonuses after BP spill" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/2011/04/06/transocean-bonus-mess-makes-goldman-look-sensitive/" target="_blank">They&#8217;re pompous bastards</a> (maybe I can&#8217;t count)</li>
</ol>
<p>On the other hand, the small guys, the startups, innovators, mom-and-pops…what ever you want to call them, really care about their product an their client.  Some of them fail because they spend more effort into creating a superior product than selling it.  And of course, we too are susceptible to &#8220;data breaches.&#8221;  But, to the one, we give it to you straight, we work with you to solve the problem, and we eat several helpings of humble pie.</p>
<p>I guess the difference is simple:  We are proud of our work.  Big business is proud of their bottom line.</p>
<p>Discuss,</p>
<p>Shantih,</p>
<p>—mickey</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=426d3fa2-9f7c-4596-a9d3-ed0f3e51baa0" alt="" /><span class="zem-script pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webconsultingdc.com/2011/epsilon-data-breach-and-why-it-pays-to-go-with-the-little-guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;We can no longer accept documents by E-mail.&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultingdc.com/2008/we-can-no-longer-accept-documents-by-e-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webconsultingdc.com/2008/we-can-no-longer-accept-documents-by-e-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Panayiotakis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wall of Shame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultingdc.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the &#8220;wall of shame&#8221; series, I got an email today that stated &#8220;Please fax in all documents. We can no longer except documents  by E-mail.&#8221;
Pause to reflect.
OK.  So, about 7 years ago when I closed on my house, my mortgage company could not send  



  
    documents by email.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_264" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.webconsultingdc.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/istock_000000700084small.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-264 " title="dunce hat" src="http://www.webconsultingdc.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/istock_000000700084small-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">in the corner!</p></div>
<p>In the &#8220;wall of shame&#8221; series, I got an email today that stated &#8220;Please fax in all documents. We can no longer except documents  by E-mail.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pause to reflect.</p>
<p>OK.  So, about 7 years ago when I closed on my house, my mortgage company could not <em>send</em> <u style="display:none"></u> <u style="display:none"></p>
<ul style="display:none">
<li></li>
</ul>
<p> <strong style="display:none"></strong> </p>
<p> </u>   documents by email.  And of course, they forgot to fed-ex the documents as well.  So we sat around for 6 hours through several attempts to fax an entire tome of contracts to the closing firm.  The first 12 attempts failed at page 40 or something.  After that they started sending it out in 30-page batches.</p>
<p>Here are are now, and people can&#8217;t receive documents over email?  What happened to technology? The environmental movement? Common sense?  And to top it off: No <em>longer <strong style="display:none"></strong></p>
<ul style="display:none">
<li></li>
<p> <em style="display:none"></em> </ul>
<p>  </em> ?!  I mean, you are a ludite or live in a cave with a single fax line, I understand.  But to have seen the light, and then step backwards about 10 years?!</p>
<p> <u style="display:none"></u> <strong style="display:none"></strong>  </p>
<p>Whoever you are, get with the times!  While you&#8217;re at it, start accepting digital signature.  I can show you how…call me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webconsultingdc.com/2008/we-can-no-longer-accept-documents-by-e-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackberry, the productivity killer</title>
		<link>http://www.webconsultingdc.com/2008/blackberry-the-productivity-killer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webconsultingdc.com/2008/blackberry-the-productivity-killer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Panayiotakis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wall of Shame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webconsultingdc.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[using mobile email productively]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_212" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 273px"><a href="http://www.webconsultingdc.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sentfrommyblackberry.gif"><img class="size-medium wp-image-212" title="sent from my blackberry…" src="http://www.webconsultingdc.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sentfrommyblackberry.gif" alt="sent from my blackberry" width="263" height="147" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">sent from you blackberry?</p></div>
<p>About a year ago, I was sitting next to a business executive type on a plane back to DC.  As soon as we touched down, he brought out his blackberry and started feverishly tapping at it.  Someone asked him about the blackberry, and he confidently exclaimed that it&#8217;s made him 25% more productive, or some such.  So I said to myself,  Hold your horses, there, skippy!</p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t know the guy.  He may have data to support his claim. But let&#8217;s break this down. His grand claim means that in an average 10 hour workday, his blackberry allows him to reclaim 2.5 hours for other tasks.  What does he do on his blackberry that gives him that time back, that would be done less efficiently without the blackberry?  Email is a lot clunkier to type on a blackberry, so it can&#8217;t be it.  Most people claim that they can get rid of email quicker since they check it on a blackberry while not at the office, and act on it, freeing up on-computer time.  And it&#8217;s fair to assume that this guy may have a one-hour commute each way. Hopefully he has someone driving him around too, because I <em>know</em> none of us are so dangerous to reply to email on the blackberry while driving.  Then, there&#8217;s meetings.  You can of course check your email in the middle of a meeting.  Speaking of efficiency, if your meeting is so trivial that you use it to check your email on your blackberry, wouldn&#8217;t it be more productive to not have the meeting in the first place?  Or do you think your lunch buddy really enjoys watching you check your email?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tackle a few other points in a bit.  I, like many of us these days, look at efficiency and productivity as it relates to our full lives: our work, of course, but also our hobbies, our personal time, our family.  The blackberry and similar devices has, for better or worse, erased the work/personal lines that used to exist at 0900 and 1700 every day.  I check email at home, at the restaurant, while I volunteer…If I&#8217;m not efficient in these places, I&#8217;m not efficient at work either.  Spending 2 hours working at home after dinner does not mean I am 2 hours more efficient.</p>
<p><span id="more-211"></span>So let&#8217;s move to item 2.  I&#8217;ve done a little informal survey of people I know who get their email delivered to their mobile device.  All of them, me included, always read the email, but usually postpone a response until they get home. (Most emails don&#8217;t, or shouldn&#8217;t, require a simple answer.)  Then when they get at their computer, they have to re-read the email, but also look for it because it&#8217;s no longer marked as &#8220;new&#8221;.  So let&#8217;s review this process:</p>
<p>On the blackberry:</p>
<ul>
<li>Read the email</li>
<li>think about how to reply</li>
<li>act on it: usually decide to reply later.</li>
<p> <strong style="display:none"><a href="http://vapors.com.br/still/s1/chicos-soma.html">chicos soma</a></strong> </ul>
<p> <strong style="display:none"></strong> </p>
<div>
<p> Then at the computer:</p>
</div>
<ul style="display:none">
<li></li>
</ul>
<div>
<ul>
<li>find the email (it&#8217;s no longer &#8220;New&#8221;)</li>
<li>Read the email</li>
<li>think about what to say</li>
<li>act (usually reply, then file the email)</li>
</ul>
<div>Here&#8217;s a worse, but more common example:</div>
<p> <strong style="display:none"></strong> </p>
<div>On the blackberry:</div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>check email</li>
<li>read email</li>
<li>reply that you&#8217;re at lunch and will reply later</li>
</ul>
<div>At the computer:</div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>remember to check the email again, since now it&#8217;s marked as &#8220;replied&#8221; so it falls into that nebulous email category of things you&#8217;ve acted on but are still on your inbox</li>
<li>read email</li>
<li>act (reply)</li>
</ul>
<div>In the meantime, the sender gets a completely pointless email from you that says &#8220;hey, I just got your message, thanks!&#8221;.  Sure, there&#8217;s a half percent chance that the email did not make it through and I didn&#8217;t get a bounce.  But really, do we need more emails floating in our inboxes saying simply &#8220;OK, got it!&#8221;?  Interestingly, we don&#8217;t do this at our computer.  Almost every email i&#8217;ve received saying &#8220;I got this, and will look at it later&#8221; come from blackberries!  So now the blackberry user has duplicated the process, and the original email sender has to open,read,act on two emails from you, not one.</div>
<div>This latter bit assumes, of course, that the blackberry will remember that the email that shows up a &#8220;replied&#8221; on his desktop requires additional action.  Processes that rely on &#8220;remember&#8221; scare me.</div>
</div>
<div>Of course, there&#8217;s still a reason to have email on your mobile, otherwise why would anyone use it?  Here are my rules for keeping blackberry email productive, for both you and the other party.</div>
<h3><strong>Check email when you have time</strong></h3>
<div>If you&#8217;re just checking email to check email, you usually end up checking it again later. There are plenty of times in our lives when we&#8217;re simply waiting.  At the airport, the DMV…you get the idea.  Then there are times when we just think we are  waiting idly when we are in fact just bored with the task at hand; sadly, too often that task is driving.</div>
<h3><strong>If you don&#8217;t have time…</strong></h3>
<p>If you often find yourself idle for short periods of time, try adding a context to your to-do list for tasks that can be completed within a short time.  Perhaps even an &#8220;@mobile&#8221; context.  When&#8217;s the last time you called your mother?  Maybe read the newspaper for once? Or go through those emails that have sat in your inbox for the past year, and file them. You haven&#8217;t done anything with them for a year: face it, you&#8217;re not about to start.  Perhaps that short email reply you&#8217;re about to send would be better handled with that other thing your blackberry can do: call a friend.</p>
<h3>Take the time for each reply</h3>
<div>Speaking of time… Nobody wants to read your one-word email.  If you&#8217;re in a rush and find yourself typing in shortened words and complete disregard for grammar, stop.  Someone took the time to send you an email.  Extend the courtesy and take the time yourself.  If someone did not take the time to send you a well-written email, then show them the errors of their way but taking the time yourself.  Further, short half-sentence answers are often ambiguous.</div>
</div>
<h3>Read, Think, Act</h3>
<p>Every time you open an email, your tasks are to read it, think about it, and act on it.  If you haven&#8217;t completed all three items, mark the item Unread so you can tackle it later.  If you Acted on it, then file it somewhere else.  A clean inbox is a happy inbox. A lot of times, the action will be to add the item to a to-do list.</p>
<h3>Cold-turkey</h3>
<ul style="display:none">
<li></li>
</ul>
<p>Finally, if you&#8217;re addicted to blackberry email, consider getting a second email address for your blackberry only, only for important communications.  If someone needs to reach you asap, they can email you on your blackberry. (Heaven forbid we call someone on the phone these days!)</p>
<p>These rules apply for your computer email as well as your blackberry email.  For additional inbox-related productivity-fu, check out <a title="43folders" href="http://www.43folders.com">43 folders</a> series, <a title="Inbox Zero" href="http://www.43folders.com/izero" target="_blank">Inbox Zero</a>. Anyone have any other thoughts or productivity ideas?  Leave a comment!</p>
<p>Oh, and on the meta side, with this post we introduce yet another new category, following on the heels of the &#8220;productivity&#8221; category: &#8220;wall of shame&#8221;.  I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll have plenty to add to it!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webconsultingdc.com/2008/blackberry-the-productivity-killer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

